deviant art

Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
[x]
more ▶

Featured in Groups:

Details

January 1
Link
Thumb

Statistics

Comments: 29
Favourites: 2 [who?]

Views: 473 (1 today)
[x]
I love photography.  Picture taking, and now picture making, has always been around and most definitely always will, but digital has brought it to a new age, delivered it properly to the time of tedious perfectionists and tumultuous individuals who don't mind biding large amounts of time in front of the screen to reach the completion of a piece.  I started in film, in a different world; I practiced the craft without even the thought of running my shots through a computer or processing them in any way shape or form, other than to develop them of course.  It makes me laugh at how we've incorporated the consciousness of programs and post production into the field, it amazes me how different we work when the restraints get lost in time, out of mind, and peeled off by the plastic.  As a photographer, I attempt to keep stride, and I read like a freakin bored bookworm to stay current with the advantages which are constantly being afforded by the technological community.  The men behind the machinery keep us on our toes, to say the least.  It's an exciting time to be a photographer because we are in the middle of a revolution.  

In my childhood I wanted to be an artist when I grew up, I buried my nose in the books of Salvador Dali and MC Escher.  In my youth I began living out that dream, and started drawing incessantly.  I liked charcoal and worked mainly in black and white, but eventually made my way into the wide world of color.  In those early years I knew of photographers, I respected the craft, but quite honestly I didn't think much of it, quite simply it didn't grab me like a moody and dark charcoal piece did, or like a wall in the city painted with every color of the rainbow did. As I got older those were the guys that blew my mind, the nameless and faceless graffiti writers… Kase, Dondi, LadyPink, Cope2, IZ, Seen, and so on.   The fact that they were out there doing it for nothing, and in many ways didn't go after any sort of recognition from mainstream society fascinated me, and I respected that.  And they were the madmen, scaling signs and hitting super high spots, or just covering a wall or train with crazy intricate art in what seemed like the blink of an eye.  They were the guys that really floored me about creation, about art.  Graffiti was, and is, a movement, it is a public expression pushed to the forefront of consciousness solely by creative placement and pushing the illegal envelope.  It is done simply because it can be, because the writer says it will be, and it is performed despite the people and the laws, despite the hatred and punishment from people who herd the sheep and tend to the cows of complacent minds and rushed time.  
 
But as much as I loved the graffiti scene, and the amazing originality and low profile style of writers, like many others I relocated away from the city and away from the scene.  And not long after I found the fades and color combinations I lusted over being laid out before me by natures hand rather than my own, and so photography entered the forefront of my focus.

Now, as the year ends and a new one begins digital photographers are really entering a new age with the resolution of full format hitting the sweet spot, and even crop frame and micro 4/3 shooters getting to the point to where we are all getting the chance to play with plenty of resolving power, which is in effect letting us all compete at an even playing field.  The past ten years the technology was moving faster than we could keep up, the evolution of DSLR's and compacts was flying by with resolution jumping up by the year, autofocus systems and methods developing, and ergonomics becoming more intuitive and refined.  With this year's Nikon release of the D800 and its full frame sensor packing 36 megapixels, and Sigma's Foveon X3 reaching 14mp, we have finally hit the pinnacle as far as the digital rendition of the traditional 35mm format.  I say this because the Bayer system of interpolation at the size of 35mm is mathematically ideal at 36 million pixels, as is the 3 layer Foveon design - which equates to roughly 42 million pixels with the three layer (vertically stacked) system.  Stepping too far beyond this point is not only unneeded in terms of resolution, but unwarranted in terms of practicality as it would be stepping past the resolution of true medium format and would warrant a larger sensor to be effective.  Quite simply, there is nowhere left to go, aside from improving the video aspect of DSLR's, which is just at the beginning stages now.  And many still photographers, myself included, don't care about video capabilities… I opted for the D300 over the D300s solely for that reason; I'd rather have a camera that does NOT shoot video.

All of this makes me extremely enthused about digital photography's near future.  As technology advances there will be fewer bugs for technicians to work out, and equipment will undoubtedly become better, faster, and more practical.  I think about how much more convenient it already is… to be able to take a shot and instantly view it alongside with a RGB histogram on the camera's LCD instead of waiting for the film to get developed and take notes, or to be able to bump up the ISO and throw on some fast glass with built in stability control instead of lugging a tripod around, or searching for somewhere to still the camera.  These big advances have fully taken form and come to maturity in the last decade or two, and I don't care what kind of film nut or naturalist you are, there is no denying that they not only speed up the progress of the learning photographer, but they have also afforded photographers more time and freedom to think about what matters most - the shot.

There are many points to argue me here, that digital makes us lazy, that digital is too easy, that digital is cheating, etcetera, etcetera.  A lot of people don't like the fact that the simplicity and accessibility of digital has attracted more people who want to be photographers, but I welcome the company, I draw off the diversity, and I thrive off the competition.  It's like anything else in life, you can hate on it, or you can turn the table and benefit from it, it's all personal choice really.  I look at it like this, digital has enabled us to shoot freer, to work faster, and to become more efficient… and more importantly, it has raised the bar for excellence quite a bit… and that particular fact, the very improvement in the quality of photography itself, should always be held in highest regard for any photographer, no matter what medium you shoot.
………………………………………………….................................................................

I'm becoming more and more confused about the scene around DA.  It seems quiet, and that sucks.  When I first came here people were so fast to speak up, and so into the work that I loved it, I mean, the feedback on here is the primary reason I think a lot of us love it.  But that seems lacking lately.  So all I can do is encourage people to speak up… this is a friendly community, there is no reason not to.  And the strange thing is that I've been posting on 500px and getting decent feedback on shots, yet I post the same shot here and nothing… I hope that changes.  This place will always be the home to the vast majority of my shots, but as I test the waters of other sites it makes me see that the photography community on here is getting lethargic.  I hoping with the New Year people get enthused about all the great work that people post on here, and that things eventually get rolling again in our community.  I'm going to do a photography feature pretty soon, and make it a point to do the rounds and talk about what I like (or don't like) about some of the work getting put up here.  Personally, I couldn't be more excited about the New Year… any sort of fresh start just seems positive in my mind, and as I said above, it's a great time to be a photographer.
  • Listening to: Drop Goblin - Strictly for the Underground
  • Reading: In the Garden - Stacy Bass
  • Drinking: Coffee
Add a Comment:
 
:iconokavanga:
Neat piece - some sharp observations. I do wonder where or whether the megapixel/resolution race will end. Storage issues are behind us, with the big capacity cards etc. I think we may see the development of even more on-camera techniques such as auto HDR from a single shot, storing of the image at three or more points during a "long" exposure time. I agree that advances in image stabilisation ought to reduce dependence on tripods, and that sensitivity advances could reduce the need for flash. Recently, some friends were amazed that I was shooting in ambient light in a dimly lit Cathedral without the need for flash with a compact camera (Panasonic LX5). I was grumbling because I had to use ISO at 1600!!

Re DA and responses/feedback - I find myself overwhelmed with trying to respond to so many people's work, especially giving something substantial by way of comment. The problem is exacerbated by running one group and helping out at a couple of others. There is just so much to do. Yet, I wish I got more feedback on my work. Probably, reciprocity and time are the keys.

Good Journal

Cheers

David
Reply
:iconenkased:
I was hoping to hear from you about this, as you are a bit of a tech-junkie like myself.

I just read a very interesting article about the resolution race which prompted this writing, it seems as though we've reached (mathematically speaking)the perfect point of density for the 35mm size digital sensor with the new releases around the 36mp mark. I found this very interesting, and as a consumer of digital equipment, relieved.

I agree that there is still tons to be done in-camera, and I hope we see some legitimate progress in this aspect... that being said, I'm not impressed by any in-camera HDR yet.

I think the sensitivity race is the most interesting because that really makes a huge difference in day to day shooting, and it also opens up our spectrum of opportunity, which is a wonderful thing.

And about DA, I know what you mean somewhat, because I've started a Tumblr and 500px and now keeping up with all three takes alot of time. I think alot of people are in the same shoes in that sense, most artists are juggling many things today which all take their share of time.

Thanks David, good to hear your thoughts.
Reply
:iconokavanga:
Re the 36 mp - many years ago (>10?) I read that the theoretical equivalent of a top quality 35 mm film frame was about 35 mp. At the time, the best digital cameras were getting about 10 mp. The author thought that film was not going to be threatened any time soon by digital. However, I reckoned that if digital got to about 20 mp, then it would have outstripped 35 mm film because even with the best equipment in the world, lenses and wet processing would degrade the "theoretical" film advantage. So, it has proved for most pro-am work. But, I must follow this up and check out what the latest theories say.

Re sensitivity - is the ISO standard still appropriate and actually being used? I get the feeling that mid-range ISO (400-3200) on my Canon cameras is not so bad for noise as film would have been. Maybe, of course, we have different noise now.

Re - DA - I have accounts on Shadowsomething and Flickr, and had one on PBase, but do not use them - just no time.

Cheers

David
Reply
:iconenkased:
You know, I hate to admit it, but I think by the time digital arrived at 10mp, film was in the dust... :) I know - that technically - I'd take my images from my Nikon D80 (10mp) over anything but very slow film - say 100 and under.

And this is coming from a person who loves film (still), and grew up shooting it.

We truly are entering a fresh phase with the combination of hitting the ideal-density-of-pixel-to-size-ratio, and glass that is constantly being refined and improved. I think this combination will step up quality and clarity, especially in the landscape/wide angle part of photography.

Yeah, I don't think the ISO is still relative to film. It seems as if I'm at 800 on my Nikon - that is more like 400 on film, and so on. I just hate digital noise, in any way shape or form. And shooting HDR I'm always dealing with it, but I've found that shooting more exposures, and leaving the luminosity low helps a great deal. With film noise it added a nice touch to certain aspects, especially portrait photography, and it even gave infrared a little bit of charactor as well.
Reply
:iconokavanga:
Some more good points - sounds like we are in broad agreement that digital ISO is not really the same as the old film ISO with about a 2:1 difference.

I'll check out luminosity settings on my HDR work (when I get time!) but on Photomatix I usually have it at the default value. I may lower it a notch on this advice.

Cheers

David
Reply
:iconenkased:
Here is a very interesting short article which basically goes against my thoughts about the future of sensor size and density.

My initial conclusion was come to because of the exact thing which this article speaks of, and breaks down nicely - diffraction limitation. I've thought the problem with DOF will drive people away when we run into these issues, but the writer thinks otherwise, and I agree with him to a certain extent. I think the camera companies will push through to the 100 - possibly even 200mp mark - but mathematically it seems to me as if it will actually make shooting more difficult, and create more time behind the computer screen in post, which I think is a step in the wrong direction...

Give it a read, it's well worth the few minutes...
Reply
:iconokavanga:
Link missing!!

David
Reply
:iconenkased:
whoops. yeah, I was super tired, here you go. [link]
Reply
(1 Reply)
:iconcatch---22:
it's exciting times to be sure.

now go out and kick this year's ass.
Reply
:iconenkased:
that it is!

:salute:
Reply
Add a Comment: